Lee Teng-hui, 97, Who Led Taiwan’s Turn to Democracy, Dies

纽约时报中文网 | JONATHAN KANDELL
https://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20200730/lee-teng-hui-dead/

Lee Teng-hui in Taipei in 2018. He succeeded Chiang Ching-kuo to become the first native president of Taiwan and later its first popularly elected leader. Lam Yik Fei for The New York Times

Lee Teng-hui, who as president of Taiwan led its transformation from an island in the grip of authoritarian rule to one of Asia’s most vibrant and prosperous democracies, died on Thursday in Taipei, the capital. He was 97.

The office of Taiwan’s president, Tsai Ing-wen, announced the death, at Taipei Veterans Hospital. News reports said the cause was septic shock and multiple organ failure.

Mr. Lee’s insistence that Taiwan be treated as a sovereign state angered the Chinese government in Beijing, which considered Taiwan part of its territory and pushed for its unification with the mainland under Communist rule. His stance posed a political quandary for the United States as it sought to improve relations with Beijing while dissuading it from taking military action to press its claims over the island.

As president from 1988 to 2000 — the first to be elected by popular vote in Taiwan — Mr. Lee never backed down from disputes with the mainland, and he continued to be a thorn in its side well into his later years. In 2018 he called, unsuccessfully, for a referendum on declaring the country’s name to be Taiwan, not the Republic of China, as it is formally known — a move that would have paved the way for sovereignty.

“China’s goal regarding Taiwan has never changed,” he told The New York Times in a rare interview at a time when the Chinese government was trying to further isolate the island from the international community. “That goal is to swallow up Taiwan’s sovereignty, exterminate Taiwanese democracy and achieve ultimate unification.”

President Tsai’s office praised Mr. Lee’s achievements, saying in a statement, “The president believes that former President Lee’s contribution to Taiwan’s democratic journey is irreplaceable and his death is a great loss to the country.”

Mr. Lee entered Taiwan’s politics during the dictatorial Nationalist Party regimes of Chiang Kai-shek and his son Chiang Ching-kuo, who assumed power after his father’s death in 1975. The Nationalists ruled with brutality, which reached a peak in 1947 with what became known as the February 28 incident, in which up to 28,000 Taiwanese were massacred by Chiang Kai-shek’s troops in response to street protests. The Nationalists imposed martial law two years later, and it was not lifted until 1987 by Chiang Ching-kuo.

Born in Taiwan, Mr. Lee joined the Nationalist Party, known as the Kuomintang or KMT, in 1971 and became an agricultural minister. He was later mayor of Taipei and governor of Taiwan Province before being tapped as vice president in 1984.

When Chiang Ching-kuo died of a heart attack in 1988, Mr. Lee succeeded him, becoming the first native Taiwanese president.

Mr. Lee being sworn in as president in January 1988 after the death of President Chiang Ching-kuo. Mr. Lee had been vice president, chosen by Mr. Chiang.Credit…Associated Press

Mr. Lee dismantled the dictatorship and worked to end the animosity between those born on the mainland and the native Taiwanese. He pushed the concept of “New Taiwanese,” a term suggesting that the islanders, no matter their backgrounds, were forging a common identity based on a democratic political system and growing prosperity.

He pursued a deliberately ambiguous policy with mainland China, shifting between rigid hostility, tentative conciliation and defiant independence. His attempts to demonstrate Taiwan’s international sovereignty sometimes provoked the mainland into saber-rattling military exercises.

One such episode occurred after a trip by Mr. Lee to the United States in 1995, ostensibly to visit Cornell University, his alma mater. China accused the United States and Taiwan of colluding to raise the island’s diplomatic status. In a demonstration of Beijing’s ire, Chinese military forces fired test missiles into the Taiwan Strait, which separates the island from the mainland. Washington countered by positioning warships off the Taiwan coast. The affair strained relations between Washington and Beijing for months.

Mr. Lee again infuriated Beijing in a German television interview in 1999 by suggesting that relations between Taiwan and China should be conducted on a “special state-to-state” basis. That provoked tirades in the official Chinese media. The People’s Liberation Army Daily denounced Mr. Lee as “the No. 1 scum in the nation.” The Xinhua News Agency called him a “deformed test-tube baby cultivated in the political laboratory of hostile anti-China forces.”

A picture released by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency showed People’s Liberation Army military exercises in 1996 during Taiwan’s first open presidential election, which Mr. Lee won. Xinhua, via Reuters

But such attacks made Mr. Lee only more popular in Taiwan. A tall, silver-haired, tough-minded campaigner with a dazzling smile, he used his charisma to rally support. He spoke the slang of the ports and factories, rode bullhorn trucks with local candidates and set off firecrackers to please the deities of local temples.

“The people like Lee Teng-hui because he stands up for them in the face of China’s dictators,” Chen Shui-bian, the mayor of Taipei at the time, said in 1996,

Lee Teng-hui was born on Jan. 15, 1923, in Sanzhi, a village on the outskirts of Taipei. His father was a police detective in the employ of the Japanese authorities that ruled Taiwan as a colony from 1895 to 1945. Mr. Lee studied agronomy in Japan at the Kyoto Imperial University and served as a second lieutenant in the Imperial Japanese Army during World War II, though he never saw action.

He returned to Taiwan after the war and secretly joined the Communist Party of China while completing his undergraduate work at the National Taiwan University. “I read everything I could get my hands on by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels,” he wrote in his 1999 memoirs, “The Road to Democracy.”

He joined the protests in the February 28 incident in 1947, but he soon renounced Marxism and joined the KMT. The party later destroyed his Communist Party records when he became politically prominent.

Mr. Lee inspecting troops in 1997. Once in office he ended decades of state-of-emergency measures on Taiwan. Reuters

Mr. Lee married Tseng Wen-fui, the daughter of a prosperous landholding family, in 1949, and both became devoted Presbyterians. They had two daughters, Anna and Annie; their only son, Hsien-wen, died of cancer. He is survived by his wife and daughters as well as a granddaughter and a grandson.

Taiwan became a separate political entity in 1949 after the civil war in China brought Mao’s Communists to power, forcing Chiang’s defeated government to flee to the island, some 100 miles from the mainland.

For the next 30 years, Taiwan, with American support, maintained the fiction that it was the seat of China’s legitimate government in exile. Washington finally recognized the Communist government in Beijing in 1979 and severed its formal diplomatic relations with Taiwan. But it continued to guarantee Taiwan’s security against a mainland invasion and backed negotiations between both sides aimed at reunification.

Mr. Lee cultivated ties with the United States during two academic stays, receiving a master’s degree in agricultural economics from Iowa State University in 1953 and a Ph.D. from Cornell in 1968. In between, he taught in Taiwanese universities, gaining recognition as an agricultural economics scholar and attracting the attention of Chiang Ching-kuo, then a deputy prime minister under his father. On the younger Chiang’s recommendation, Mr. Lee was appointed minister without portfolio. He distinguished himself by promoting programs that raised health standards and farm incomes.

Mr. Lee, center, and his wife, Tsang Wen-hui, foreground, on a goodwill visit to the United States in 1983, when he was governor of Taiwan Province. He was named vice president the next year. Associated Press

With Chiang Ching-kuo installed as president, Mr. Lee was appointed mayor of Taipei in 1978 and set about modernizing the capital’s road and sewer systems. As governor of Taiwan Province, from 1981 to 1984, he pushed agrarian reforms that helped achieve a balanced growth between urban and rural areas, still a hallmark of Taiwan.

Mr. Chiang selected Mr. Lee as his vice president in 1984. It was a dramatic departure from the usual practice of appointing only former mainland Chinese to top government posts. His selection was viewed as a gesture toward the native Taiwanese, who had been politically powerless despite accounting for 85 percent of the population.

When Mr. Lee became president in 1988 on Mr. Chiang’s death, he moved to break with the Chiang family’s autocratic system, publicly deploring the February 28 massacres. He ended decades of state-of-emergency measures, allowed citizens to send mail to mainland relatives and visit them, dropped bans on street demonstrations, eased press restrictions, promoted a multiparty system and decreed open elections for the National Assembly.

The KMT easily retained control of the legislature, but more than three-fourths of the seats went to Taiwanese natives.

“What had been a tight police state under Chiang Kai-shek and his son Chiang Ching-kuo is now the most democratic society in the Chinese-speaking world,” The Times declared in a 1992 editorial.

Mr. Lee campaigning in Taipei in 1996. After succeeding to the office as vice president, he became Taiwan’s first popularly elected president. The Asahi Shimbun, via Getty Images

Mr. Lee was elected outright in 1996, in Taiwan’s first open presidential contest. Seeking to begin a dialogue with Beijing, he supported a policy of “one China, two equal governments.” But he insisted that Taiwan would rejoin the mainland only if China became a democratic, capitalist society. In the meantime he again called for “state to state” relations between Taipei and Beijing, a policy that the mainland rejected. Instead, Chinese officials tried to persuade other countries to cut all ties with Taiwan, asserting that any improvement in relations would come only after Mr. Lee had retired.

Mr. Lee was succeeded in 2000 by Chen Shui-bian, the Democratic Progressive Party candidate whose election ended KMT rule. In his two terms, Mr. Chen presided over a huge expansion of Taiwan’s trade and investment in China, a process that had already been underway during the Lee presidency. But like his predecessor, Mr. Chen frustrated Beijing’s attempts to get Taipei to acknowledge the mainland’s sovereignty and embrace a timetable for unification.

Mr. Lee came out of retirement in 2018 to help create the Formosa Alliance, a new party calling for the formal independence of Taiwan from China. But the party did not go ahead with a promised referendum on independence.

Late in life, Mr. Lee endured the ignominy of corruption charges. In June 2011, he was indicted, along with a financier, Liu Tai-ying, on charges of embezzling almost $8 million in public funds during his presidency. Mr. Lee was acquitted in 2013.

He took solace in proclaiming that he had helped his island of 23 million inhabitants serve as a beacon for the 1.4 billion people on the mainland. Or, as he wrote in his memoirs, “We have developed the economy and have embraced democracy, becoming the model for a future reunified China.”

Mr. Lee in 2018. He came out of retirement that year to help create the Formosa Alliance, a new party calling for the formal independence of Taiwan from China. Lam Yik Fei for The New York Times

U.K. changes diplomatic immunity rules after teen, Harry Dunn, dies near U.S. base

NBC News / Adela Suliman
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/u-k-changes-diplomatic-immunity-rules-after-teen-harry-dunn-n1234566

LONDON — Britain will no longer offer immunity from criminal prosecution to the families of the American staff at a military base near where a teenager was killed by a car driven by the wife of an American diplomat.

The change, announced by Foreign Minister Dominic Raab on Wednesday, comes after intense lobbying by the family of Harry Dunn, 19, who died in August 2019 after his motorcycle was struck by Anne Sacoolas, an American, near the base at Croughton Annex — a British installation used by the United States.

Harry Dunn.Courtesy of the Dunn Family

The United Kingdom’s decision comes a day after Dunn’s death was raised in a meeting between Prime Minister Boris Johnson — who has previously called for Sacoolas to return to the country — and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo who was making a brief trip to London.

“The U.S. waiver of immunity from criminal jurisdiction is now expressly extended to the family members of U.S. staff at the Croughton Annex,” Raab said in a statement. “Permitting the criminal prosecution of the family members of those staff, should these tragic circumstances ever arise again.”

Raab said the changes took effect Monday, implying they would not be retroactive.

Dunn’s mother, Charlotte Charles, welcomed the decision as a “huge step forward” and said it would ensure a similar tragedy would “never happen to another family,” she told Britain’s PA News Agency.

She said her son would be “proud” but vowed to continue to campaign for Sacoolas to return to the U.K.

The case sparked a transatlantic dispute between Washington and London about whether Sacoolas had diplomatic immunity from prosecution.

Dunn’s parents have called for Sacoolas to return to the U.K. to face trial after she was charged in December with causing death by dangerous driving.

Her lawyer has said previously that Sacoolas will not return voluntarily to potentially face jail for “a terrible but unintentional accident.”

The State Department also said Sacoolas was covered by diplomatic immunity and could not be extradited, in a move that caused friction with London. NBC News has yet to receive comment from the State Department on the latest U.K. rule change.

Family spokesman Radd Seiger speaks on behalf of father of Harry Dunn, Tim Dunn, center right, and mother Charlotte Charles, center left, after meeting with Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab in 2019. Peter Summers / Getty Images

In October, Dunn’s family met with President Donald Trump at the White House to petition him to extradite Sacoolas. During the meeting, Trump dropped a “bombshell” according to Dunn’s mother, revealing that Sacoolas was waiting to meet the family in the room next door. The family declined to meet her.

“We have the deepest sympathy for Harry Dunn’s family. No family should have to experience what they have gone through and I recognize that these changes will not bring Harry back,” Raab said.

He said he hoped the change in rules would at least bring “some small measure of comfort” to the Dunn family.

Australian Student Sues Government Over Financial Risks of Climate Change

New York Times 
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/23/world/australia/lawsuit-climate-change-bonds.html

Firefighters on the outskirts of Bredbo, New South Wales, Australia, in February, when wildfires devastated vast stretches of the state. Matthew Abbott for The New York Times

SYDNEY, Australia — Katta O’Donnell grew up with a fear of fire. As a child, she remembers burning bark falling from the air because of wildfires. This year, she worried that the blazes sweeping across regional Australia, fueled by climate change, could destroy her home outside Melbourne, the same way they had turned thousands of acres into ash.

Now, Ms. O’Donnell, 23, is leading a class-action lawsuit filed on Wednesday that accuses the Australian government of failing to disclose the material risks of climate change to those investing in government bonds. The suit accuses the government and the treasury of breaching its duty by not disclosing the risks of global warming and their material impact on investors.

It is the first time, experts say, that such a climate change case has been brought against a sovereign nation.

Ms. O’Donnell is joining a wave of young climate activists who have stepped on to the world stage in recent years. The Swedish teenager Greta Thunberg, for example, has spurred a global protest movement, testified before the United States Congress and the European Parliament, scolded world leaders in a fiery speech at the United Nations for not doing enough and sounded that alarm at the World Economic Forum in Davos, declaring, “Our house is still on fire.”

But Ms. O’Donnell’s case takes a unique tack by focusing on government bonds and the investment environment, said Jacqueline Peel, a law professor at University of Melbourne.

“My personal experience with climate change makes everything I read about climate change more tangible,” Ms. O’Donnell, a fifth-year law student at La Trobe University in Melbourne, said in a recent interview. “I want my government acting with honesty and telling the truth about climate risks.”

Simply put: Any risks to the country’s economic growth, value of its currency or international relations, to name a few factors, might change the value of her investment, her suit states.

Ms. O’Donnell, backed by a team including two prominent lawyers, is not asking for damages, but wants the government to step up on its climate change policies. The suit seeks an injunction stopping the government from further marketing bonds until they add those disclosures.

Katta O’Donnell, who is leading a class-action lawsuit against the Australian government. Photo: Molly Townsend

“The claim asks for disclosure of risks — it doesn’t tell the government what to do or how to act,” said David Barnden, one of three lawyers representing Ms. O’Donnell. All took her case free, they said.

But experts say that the case’s strategy is interesting given that the government has the power to legislate on climate change and control, in part, that risk.

The Australian government has not publicly responded to the lawsuit. Reached for comment, a spokeswoman for the Treasury Department said in a statement that it did not comment on current court proceedings.

Australia is physically vulnerable to climate change, which has helped drive drought, broken temperature records and led to the bleaching of the Great Barrier reef, so the financial risks of investing in the country have raised concerns. In 2019, Sweden’s central bank said it was letting go of Western Australian and Queensland government bonds in part because the greenhouse emissions from both were too high.

In recent years, the country’s financial and corporate regulator have pressured financial institutions that issue bonds to disclose their plans to measure and mitigate the risks related to climate change.

“One of the major issuers of securities on the global financial markets is not leading from the front,” Rob Henderson, the former chief economist for National Australia Bank, said of the government’s lack of disclosure.

Ms. O’Donnell’s case builds on an emerging trend of climate litigation, with calls for private companies to take responsibility for their part in the growing threat to the planet.

A Peruvian man chose to sue Germany’s largest energy company because, he said, melting glaciers exacerbated by climate change are threatening his home. Other nations, including the Pacific island of Vanuatu, which are facing a threat to their very existences because of climate change, have said they are considering taking legal action against the world’s biggest fossil-fuel companies.

In all, 1,587 climate litigation cases have been brought worldwide since 1986 and May this year, with Australia second only to the United States, according to the Grantham Institute of Research on Climate Change and the Environment. The cases have been filed “as a way of either advancing or delaying effective action on climate change,” the institute says.

It is unclear if Ms. O’Donnell will be successful. But with many private corporations measuring — and promising to mitigate — their contributions to climate change, there is “strong acceptance of the simple argument that climate change poses material and financial risks,” said Anita Foerster, a senior lecturer in business law at Monash University.

Ms. O’ Donnell, who bought her first government-issued bonds this year, says her interest in climate law and its effect on investors began when she heard Mr. Barnden, now her lawyer, speak at a lecture last year. She said she chose her legal strategy because she wanted to educate herself and others who bought such bonds of the potential financial risks of climate change.

A forest near Lake Conjola in New South Wales, Australia, where a fire swept through on Dec. 31. Matthew Abbott for The New York Times

“All routes are crucial, and we will need to unite.” she said. “But investment and the economies and the climate are all so closely linked, and that really needs to be highlighted.”

“The government knows about the problem,” she added. “They know the solutions, and they know what they need to do but they’re not doing it.”

Mr. Henderson said he expected the case to prompt those in other nations to follow suit: “Other people will be saying, hang on what about our government?”

TikTok introduces US$200 million fund for US creators despite political headwinds

South China Morning Post / Coco Feng
https://www.scmp.com/tech/apps-social/article/3094501/tiktok-introduces-us200-million-fund-us-creators-despite-political

TikTok creators in the US will be able to tap into a new US$200 million fund. Photo: EPA-EFE

TikTok, the short video app facing a potential ban in the US, has introduced a US$200 million fund to reward creators on its hugely popular platform.

The fund, open to applications from US creators above 18 starting in August, will initially target influencers such as teachers and livestreamers and help all video makers collaborate on paid campaigns with brands, the company said Thursday.

The funding will be distributed in the coming year and is expected to grow during that time. Qualified recipients must meet an unspecified baseline for followers and post original content in line with TikTok rules.

TikTok, the first major success in global cyberspace by a Chinese company, is facing strong political headwinds in several international markets. In the first half of 2020, the app recorded 596 million downloads, ranking top among non-game apps even without taking into account its Chinese version Douyin, according to analytics firm Sensor Tower.

The US is TikTok’s third-largest market, contributing 8.2 per cent of new installations from January to June, after India and Brazil, which accounted for 27.6 and 9.6 per cent respectively, according to Sensor Tower.

A US Senate panel on Wednesday introduced a proposed ban on TikTok being used on devices operated by government employees. The legislation will move to the Senate floor and then be voted on by both chambers.

In India, 59 Chinese apps, including TikTok, were banned after a deadly border clash last month. Australia is also scrutinising the app over foreign interference and data privacy concerns. Pakistan’s telecoms authority on Tuesday urged TikTok to control obscenity, vulgarity and immorality on the platform.

“While the past few months have been challenging for many, we’ve been awed by the outpouring of empathy, humour, and truly uplifting content from our users,” TikTok US general manager Vanessa Pappas wrote on its website.

TikTok has long been accused of lacking in rewards for content creators. Unlike YouTube which allows creators to monetise content from ads on the platform, TikTok influencers only receive tips during live streams, which is a very small part of the video content.

Earlier this week, three of TikTok’s biggest creators announced off-platform deals. Charli D’Amelio, the most followed creator and her sister Dixie D’Amelio announced a make-up line, and Addison Rae, the platform’s second most followed account, said she will host a Spotify-exclusive podcast co-hosted by her mother.

The new fund aims to “realise additional earnings” for creators and “encourage those who dream of using their voices and creativity to spark inspirational careers,” Pappas wrote.

中国对美政策的困境:如何保持强硬但避免“分手”

纽约时报中文版 / KEITH BRADSHER, STEVEN LEE MYERS
https://cn.nytimes.com/china/20200724/us-china-consulate/

北京——两周前,中国外交部长王毅曾呼吁美国在两国关系问题上悬崖勒马,寻找合作途径。没过几天,他在与俄罗斯外长通电话时抱怨说,美国“已经失去了理智、道德和信用”。

问题现在是,中国在这方面能做什么。特朗普政府对中国的广泛攻击,几乎没给中国领导人留下多少不会威胁让两国关系彻底破裂的选项。在中国正与印度、英国、加拿大、澳大利亚等许多其他国家发生冲突的时候,如果中美关系彻底破裂,北京可能会更加孤立,已受新冠病毒大流行及其全球后果影响的中国经济也可能遭受伤害。

美国周二公布命令,要求中国仅在72小时内关闭驻休斯敦总领事馆,这只是政府激怒中国官员的最新行为。在短短几周里,中国政府已忍受了抵制中国5G无线技术的运动力度加大、对负责香港和穆斯林为主的新疆地区官员的制裁,现在美国又指控中国派遣数十名隐瞒身份的军人来美窃取商业、军事,甚至医学秘密。

中国外交部发言人周四再次誓言,将对美国关闭领馆的做法采取必要的反制措施。他把美国政府的指控斥为“恶意诬蔑”。

官方的愤怒正在中国激起反美情绪,让鹰派更加大胆地发声。民族主义者呼吁,中国除了采取克制的针对性措施,还要更进一步,甚至应该考虑关闭美国驻香港总领事馆。

“让他们紧张着吧,”中共党报《环球时报》总编辑胡锡进在提到驻中国六个使领事馆的美国外交官时写道。他说,美国驻香港总领事馆“明摆着”就是个情报中心,并大大夸大了驻香港工作人员的数量。

他还提到了驻休斯敦总领事馆收到关闭命令后的匆忙反应,可以看见有人在领馆院子里把文件放在金属容器中烧掉。“让他们各家领馆都做一个紧急计划,都把文件打好包,准备烧掉。”

美国已命令中国关闭其驻休斯敦的领事馆。GO NAKAMURA/GETTY IMAGES

幕后的中国高级官员似乎无意让紧张局势进一步升级,他们担心在特朗普总统竞选连任的当下,任何举动都可能让他有可乘之机。特朗普如果以高调的方式与中国摊牌,可能会分散美国人对他在疫情中拙劣应对措施的注意力,让他能以一个保卫自己国家对抗外国势力的领导人形象来进行竞选。“这是一种典型的游戏,从外部找一个分散注意力的事情,来激发人民对总统的支持,”北京的香港问题高级顾问刘兆佳说。

与此同时,北京不能在美国的密集攻击面前表现软弱。中国的学校逐步培养起来的、被官方媒体放大的民族自豪感要求中国领导人在来自国外的挑战面前保持强硬立场。

“中国需要维护自己的荣誉和主权,”上海复旦大学国际关系教授沈丁立说。

中国外交部发言人汪文斌在周四的例行记者会上说得很明白,中国官员们十分清楚他们的两难处境。

“我们没有兴趣去干预美国的大选,我们也希望美方不要在大选当中拿中国说事,”他说,并马上警告特朗普政府:“我们奉劝美方不要一错再错,否则中方必将作出正当和必要的反应。”

与美国紧张关系的不断升级暴露了北京在应对问题上的分歧。美中之间的冲突比中国官员仅在几周前所预计的要广泛、激烈得多。

据几名参与中国政策制定的人士透露,分歧中的一方是中国安全部门和军队的官员,他们反对采取任何可能被美国解读为软弱的和解立场。另一方是那些主要关心经济问题的官员,他们寻求对美国的行动做出更慎重的回应,比如保持贸易停战状态不变。由于外交问题的敏感性,这些知情人士要求不透露姓名。

熟悉中国政策制定的人士说,即使在驻休斯敦领事馆关闭之后,中国仍会执行今年1月15日与美国签署的所谓第一阶段贸易协议。

如果中国想在美国总统大选中伤害特朗普的话,北京可以停止大量购买美国食品。根据新冠病毒疫情暴发之前签署的贸易协议,中国同意购买美国食品。停止购买会惩罚美国农民,他们在一些州可能是重要的选民阵营。

芝加哥大型贸易公司福斯通(INTL FCStone)驻上海的大宗农产品专家达林·弗里德里希(Darin Friedrichs)说,到目前为止,中国今年夏天一直在大量购买美国的玉米、小麦、高粱和猪肉。不到两周前,中国完成了有史以来最大一笔购买美国玉米的单笔订单,距离上一笔大宗交易仅隔4天。

今年1月,美国和中国签署了一份有限的贸易协议。中国据说将继续遵守这份协议。PETE MAROVICH FOR THE NEW YORK TIMES

中国领导人习近平仍是北京政策辩论的最终仲裁者,他还没有对两国关系恶化发表言论。周三,关闭领事馆的消息公开时,习近平正在远离北京的吉林省视察,似乎未受外交冲突的惊扰。周四,他视察中国人民解放军空军航空大学时,只谈了8月份纪念建军节的事情。

“北京的政策总是由习本人来调整,”北京的独立分析师吴强说。“他自己踩油门,然后自己踩刹车。”

中国人似乎对中美关系的急剧恶化感到震惊。外交部长王毅在7月9日的讲话中似乎为稳定两国关系画出了途径。

“习近平主席多次强调:我们有一千条理由把中美关系搞好,没有一条理由把中美关系搞坏,”他说。“只要双方都有改善和发展中美关系的积极意愿,我们就能够推动中美关系走出困境,重回正轨。”

尽管如此,中国人在许多新战线上面临对峙。在关闭领事馆的这轮最新攻击中,特朗普政府指控中国外交官在美国各地的几起经济间谍和试图盗窃科研成果的案件中起帮助作用。

中国官员愤怒地谴责了关闭领事馆的做法,称其为一种挑衅行为,将进一步破坏已经恶化的关系。中国驻休斯敦总领事蔡伟说,关闭驻休斯敦领事馆的做法是对中美关系的“极大破坏”。中国驻休斯敦总领馆是1979年中美正式建交后,北京在美国设立的第一个领事馆。

在以前关系紧张时,两国元首特朗普和习近平有时会通过打一次长途电话或见一次面来缓和分歧。在贸易战恶化时,以及在新冠病毒暴发初期双方的言语冲突升级时,都曾发生过这种情况。

不过,华盛顿现在用的语调已比以前更糟。特朗普似乎对化解危机已经不再感兴趣。

“习近平反而可以采取主动,”加州大学圣迭哥分校21世纪中国研究中心主任谢淑丽(Susan L. Shirk)说。“习近平也可以通过邀请美国与中国一起领导一场为测试、生产和公平分配新冠病毒疫苗做规划的国际努力,来展示中国的善意。”

来自华盛顿的强硬政策和言辞表明,是美国,而不是中国,正在为双边关系设定越来越对抗的基调。“我认为,开始的时候你可以将关系的大部分失衡归咎于中国,”亚洲协会美中关系中心主任夏伟(Orville Schell)说。“但随着美国尽最大努力挑战中国,它似乎不再有兴趣敞开大门,找到改进措施。”

考虑到美国行动的广范程度,以及两党对这些行动越来越多的支持,即使特朗普的挑战者小约瑟夫·R·拜登(Joseph R. Biden Jr.)在大选中获胜的话,目前也不清楚中国是否能够指望情况会有所改善。

夏伟指出,拜登任副总统时曾与习近平见过多次面,两人甚至一起旅行过。

“拜登可以利用他们之间存在的一种对称来重塑中美关系,”夏伟说。“真正的问题是,习近平是否能用同样的方式来回应——为得到一点东西而做出一点让步,这是否会被视为软弱。”

“我确实认为拜登及其团队完全有能力找到一个新的平衡点,”夏伟还说。“我不太相信中国会发现这一点容易做到。”

Startups are already moving data and employees out of Hong Kong over its new security law

Bloomberg Quint / Felix Tam
https://www.bloombergquint.com/china/tech-firms-begin-to-abandon-hong-kong-because-of-security-law

China’s sweeping national security law has forced technology firms to reconsider their presence in Hong Kong. The nimblest among them — the city’s startups — are already moving data and people out or are devising plans to do so.

Beijing’s polarizing law, which took effect this month, upended Hong Kong’s tech scene just as it seemed on a path to becoming a regional hub. Entrepreneurs now face a wave of concern from overseas clients and suppliers about the implications of running data and internet services under the law’s new regime of vastly expanded online policing powers. Many are making contingency plans and restructuring their operations away from Hong Kong.

Their actions may foreshadow similar decisions from internet giants like Facebook Inc., Alphabet Inc.’s Google and Twitter Inc., all of which confront the same set of uncertainties. The larger firms are taking time to fully assess the impact of the new law, while sentiment in the city itself is dour with about half of U.S. business people saying they plan to leave, according to a recent survey by the American Chamber of Commerce in Hong Kong.

Tech Firms Begin to Abandon Hong Kong Over Security Law

“We are now in a dilemma. If we follow the law in Hong Kong, we may violate other countries’ regulations,” said Ben Cheng, co-founder of software company Oursky. “We worry that people will not trust us someday if we tell them we are a Hong Kong-based company.”

Twelve-year-old Oursky has already had trouble in the short period since the law came into force, with some foreign cloud service providers refusing to work with Hong Kong-based entities and reviewing the practice, Cheng said without elaborating. To circumnavigate these issues, his company will set up offices in the U.K. in about a year and then expand to Japan.

Tech companies that handle data are particularly vulnerable under the new law. Police can ask them to delete or restrict access to content deemed to endanger national security, with non-compliance punishable with a fine of HK$100,000 (around $13,000) and six months in prison for representatives of infringing publishers. Such provisions put technology companies under “tremendous risk and liability,” said Charles Mok, a Hong Kong lawmaker. “It’s a signal to these companies to be very careful. If you want to be safe and you don’t want the uncertainty, then maybe you have to leave Hong Kong.”

In recent years, the global financial center has grown into an attractive destination for fintech entrepreneurs, and its close proximity to Shenzhen and the so-called Greater Bay Area has helped foster research and development ties between startups and Chinese universities. Hong Kong had been expected to reach $1.7 billion in datacenter revenue by 2023, rivaling nearby Singapore whose server market brought in $1.4 billion last year, according to data from Structure Research. All that is now under threat.

More than half of Measurable AI’s clients are U.S.-based. The Hong Kong firm tracks business receipts and provides transactional data to hedge funds and corporations, many of whom have expressed concern about how data trade may be affected by the Beijing law as well as Washington’s retaliatory measure of rescinding Hong Kong’s special trade status. “Right now might be a good time for us to rethink how we can restructure or have the operations outside of Hong Kong,” co-founder Heatherm Huang said, adding that the company’s accelerating plans to migrate parts of its business development and sales to Singapore and New York.

“Doing a startup in Hong Kong is already difficult. It’s a super expensive city,” Scott Salandy-Defour, co-founder of energy-tech startup Liquidstar, told Bloomberg News. Even before the new law, the situation in the city was fraught with U.S.-China tensions over everything from trade to human rights. Investors have become very cautious about people and businesses with ties to China and the new law “is like the last nail in the coffin,” said the entrepreneur, who is now planning to relocate to Singapore.

One founder of an edtech venture, who like several executives interviewed asked not to be identified because of the sensitivity of the issue, said their company had transferred all its data to portable offline storage in case there was a need to leave Hong Kong in the future.

“This would be just a short-term phenomenon. I think after they understand the society is more stable, businesses will come back,” said Terence Chong, an associate professor of economics at the Chinese University of Hong Kong. “Hong Kong is the gateway to China. If they want to have access to China’s market, it is the best place for them.” Supporters of the law see it as a necessary step to restore investor and business confidence by curbing months of sometimes-violent unrest that have rocked the former British colony.

For some, the allure of closer integration with China through the Greater Bay Area is too good a chance to pass up. “I think Hong Kong can still play the role it’s always played, bringing international and Chinese players in technology closer together,” said Tony Verb, co-founder of GreaterBay Ventures.“I don’t see reasons right now to run away.”

German scientists are hosting a pop concert for 4,000 people to study how the coronavirus spreads in large groups and how to combat it

Business Insider / James Pasley
https://www.businessinsider.com/german-scientists-host-concert-to-study-how-the-coronavirus-spreads-2020-7

German scientists are throwing a concert — using fog machines, fluorescent hand sanitizer, and contact tracer devices — to work out if it’s possible to hold large indoor events during the pandemic without spreading the coronavirus.

Scientists from the Martin Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg (MLU) are calling for 4,000 people to head to an indoor stadium in Leipzig to see German pop singer Tim Bendzko on August 22, as part of a $1.1 million project called Restart-19.

The singer Tim Bendzko onstage at the tour kickoff of “Night of the Proms” in the Barclaycard Arena. Photo: Georg Wendt/dpa (Photo by Georg Wendt/picture alliance via Getty Images)

MLU head of clinical infectious diseases, Stefan Mortiz, who is coordinating the experiment, told The Guardian: “We are trying to find out if there could be a middle way between the old and the new normal that would allow organizers to fit enough people into a concert venue to not make a loss.”

On MLU’s website, it states banning crowds to lower the risk of the coronavirus spreading has become “an existential threat for many athletes and artists, who depend on their audience for income,” according to Deutsche Welle.

Large crowds at official events have been rare since the pandemic hit.

Earlier this month, New Zealand hosted a rugby match with 20,000 attendees, and last month President Donald Trump held a rally in Tulsa with about 6,200 attendees in June, but large events have mostly been canceled to avoid the coronavirus from spreading, The Guardian reported.

Willing participants for Restart-19 must be aged between 18 and 50 and test negative for the coronavirus 48 hours before the experiment.

The participants, all wearing masks, will experience three concerts — one without social distancing, one with a slower entry and more focused on hygiene, and a final version where participants will sit far enough away from each other to maintain social distancing.

Information will be provided to scientists in a number of ways, including participants transmitting data every 5 seconds about where they are in the stadium, using an electronic contact tracer.

They will use fluorescent hand sanitizer so that scientists with UV lights will be able to see what surfaces have been touched and “become particularly dangerous,” according to MLU’s website.

A fog machine will be pumping out fog to help visualize how the coronavirus could spread by aerosols.

According to MLU’s website, the risk of getting COVID-19 by attending the concert will be “very low,” but it does not guarantee that it’s completely risk-free.

As of July 21, 878 people had registered for the concert.

If all goes well, the scientists aim to present their findings based on the data in October.

With Tourists Gone, Bali Workers Return to Farms and Fishing

The New York TimesNyimas Laula and 

LALANGLINGGAH VILLAGE, Indonesia — Ni Nyoman Ayu Sutaryani, a mother of three, made a steady living for two decades working as a masseuse and yoga instructor at Bali’s luxury hotels and spas. Now at 37 she finds herself back on the farm of her childhood village here, standing precariously at the top of a tall bamboo ladder, picking cloves.

It is not the life that Ms. Ayu had imagined for herself. But on Bali, which depends heavily on tourism, she is one of thousands of workers who have been forced by the coronavirus pandemic to return to their villages and traditional ways of making a living.

“This is my first time being jobless, and sometimes I want to cry,” Ms. Ayu said. “Everything is returning to the old time. That’s what we have to do rather than starving.”

Like Ms. Ayu, many have returned to their family farms, helping to plant and harvest crops. Others feed their families by digging for clams in shallow Benoa Bay or by casting fishing lines out to sea from one of Bali’s deserted beaches.

In a sign of how far the economy of the Indonesian island has declined, some rural residents have turned to bartering fruit and vegetables so that they can save their limited cash to buy necessities.

Bali, with a population of 4.4 million and eight times the physical size of Singapore, is Indonesia’s tourism engine, boasting spectacular beaches, terraced rice fields, scenic temples and ideal weather. Largely Hindu in a predominantly Muslim nation, Bali carved out its own identity as a tourist destination decades ago and was once widely viewed from abroad as an independent country. Hoping to capitalize on the Bali name, the central government began a campaign last year to create 10 “new Bali” destinations.

A deserted street in Seminyak, Bali, in early July. The area is usually packed with tourists. / Nyimas Laula for The New York Times

More than half of Bali’s economy depends directly on tourism, and a quarter is engaged in tourism-related activities, such as transporting visitors and supplying food to hotels and restaurants. Last year, Bali attracted more than six million tourists from abroad and 10 million from Indonesia.

The number of hotels keeps growing; some international chains operate more than two dozen. President Trump has gotten in on the act, partnering with a politically connected billionaire to build a Trump-branded hotel and golf resort.

The economy has suffered through other disasters: the 2002 Bali bombing, the 2003 SARS epidemic and the 2017 eruption of the Mount Agung volcano. But the coronavirus outbreak has been the most devastating.

In March, Indonesia banned foreign visitors from the worst-hit countries and, weeks later, extended the ban to all foreign tourists. In May, the government banned domestic tourists from traveling to Bali, although officials and business travelers with a negative coronavirus test were allowed.

Nevertheless, Indonesia has surpassed China in the number of cases to become the country hit hardest in East Asia, with more than 88,000 cases and 4,200 deaths as of Monday. On Bali, the number of cases has doubled, to 2,781, and deaths have quadrupled, to 44, in a little more than three weeks.

The travel restrictions have slammed Bali’s tourism industry. During the first half of the year, the island received 1.1 million foreign tourists, almost all of them before the pandemic. That was a drop from nearly 2.9 million during the same period last year. Comparative figures for domestic tourists were not available.

An abandoned tourist hut in Bali, which has seen its tourist-driven economy dwindle. / Nyimas Laula for The New York Times

Impatient to revive the economy, Bali’s governor, I Wayan Koster, began gradually reopening the island this month, including restaurants and popular beaches. He hopes to bring back domestic tourists to Bali starting next week and attract foreign tourists beginning Sept. 11.

For a generation, young people have been drawn from villages in northern Bali to work in the tourist centers, mainly in southern Bali. Many attend tourism vocational schools before taking jobs in hotels, restaurants and tour agencies.

“Tourism has become the dominant work for most people,” said Ricky Putra, chairman of the Bali Hotels Association.

The pandemic has forced hotels and other tourist facilities to lay off some workers and cut the pay and hours of others. Larger hotels have kept skeleton staffs on duty, rotating workers in for a week or two at a time, while allowing them to make a little money and return to their villages.

“Mostly they are going back to their villages,” said Mr. Ricky, who is also general manager of the Santrian Resorts and Villas hotel group. “Some of them can use this very challenging time to help their parents and go back to their village farming or fishing.”

A fish market in Kuta. / Nyimas Laula for The New York Times

One local leader, Dewa Komang Yudi, said he welcomed the return of tourism workers to his community, Tembok Village, in far northern Bali. He said that about 400 unemployed workers — waiters, spa employees, drivers and cook’s helpers — had returned to the village of 7,000 and were growing food on land that had been fallow for lack of workers. He hopes many will stay permanently.

“Deurbanization suddenly occurred because of the pandemic,” he said. “There are more people now in north Bali than in south Bali because many of them returned to their villages. This is what we have been dreaming about.”

Mr. Yudi, 33, who himself attended a tourism academy and used to work as a hotel butler, said Bali should devote more resources to farming, a more sustainable enterprise. Instead, it has become overly reliant on tourism.

“People are depending on it like opium,” he said. “Tourism is fragile, and we have gone too far. We have been abandoning the fundamental things that mobilize the economy.”

Across the island, some communities give food aid to the unemployed, such as rice, instant noodles, cooking oil and sugar. But recipients say it is not enough to live on. Many also have debts, like installment payments for motorbikes, a common mode of transportation on the island.

Produce including bananas, cloves, coconuts and papayas on the back of a truck in Mundeh. / Nyimas Laula for The New York Times

At Benoa Bay, on the southern end of the island, low tide attracts dozens of people from villages nearby to dig for clams, using rakes made of scrap wood, nails or even their bare hands and feet. On a good day, one can collect more than a pound of clams.

Some also hunt for small crabs using a wooden stick with two iron hooks that are bent like fingers. If their families are lucky enough to have traditional boats, known as a jukung, they go out to sea and catch shrimp.

Kadek Merta, 34, who was digging for clams recently, said he had been a hotel steward but had not worked since March. “I feel hollow,” he said. “There is no job. I can only survive by depending on the sea.”

Agung Yoga, 39, a junior chef, said he used to fish as a hobby along Bali’s southern beaches, sometimes wading out into the surf. But now, unemployed for the first time, he is fishing as a matter of survival for himself and his family.

“If this situation continues until next year, I am hopeless,” he said. “Maybe we won’t be able to eat.”

Ms. Ayu — whose sister, brother, uncles, nephews and cousins all work in tourism — preferred working as a masseuse, because she earned a decent income and it was easier. Harvesting cloves in Lalanglinggah Village from the tops of trees that grow more than 60 feet tall can be hazardous. But living in the village, on the southwestern coast of Bali, a few miles from the sea, has its advantages, too.

Ni Nyoman Ayu Sutaryani harvesting cloves in Lalanglinggah Village last month. / Nyimas Laula for The New York Times

From the top of a homemade ladder, Ms. Ayu could see the beach and the forest, and feel a gentle breeze flowing in from the Bali Strait. “I feel serene,” she said during a break in picking. “In the city, it is crowded. Having this activity calms my mind.”

More important, the return to traditional village life has reunited relatives who usually see one another only on important holidays.

“I earn more working in tourism,” Ms. Ayu said. “But on the positive side, God has given us this situation so we can be with our families.”

Hong Kong Autonomy Act: US tariffs, sanctions, export bans ‘all on the table’ after Donald Trump signs law

DW / Elliot Douglas
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/opinion/sunday/twitter-protest-politics.html

US President Donald Trump signed the Hong Kong Autonomy Act at the White House on Tuesday. Photo: Bloomberg

After US President Donald Trump signed the Hong Kong Autonomy Act and an executive order that will remove the city’s preferential trade status, legal experts have warned that “all is on the table” with regard to possible punitive actions against Hong Kong.

The act contains a clear path to sanctioning individuals and the financial  institutions where they bank, though extended review periods mean these  may not come into force until December 2021, at the latest.

It comes after the United States already revoked Hong Kong’s preferential access to export controls exemption licenses, cutting the city off from sensitive technology shipments from the US in response to China’s controversial national security law for the city.

“The Hong Kong Autonomy Act is a big blow to Hong Kong and China, and is the latest example of the free-fall style of US-China relations,” said Shi Yinhong, an adviser to China’s State Council and professor at Renmin University. “Now China is in a difficult position – its domestic economy needs to be improved and the international situation is hostile towards China.”

Trump’s executive order does not mention tariffs nor Hong Kong’s ongoing access to the US dollars payments system, but by stripping the city of its special trading status, it has opened the door to duties on the small volume of goods shipped to America, experts said.

“My view, and this has played out with the [US Department of] Commerce’s export controls announcement a couple of weeks ago, is that the State  Department declining to certify Hong Kong’s continued justification for its  special status is all that’s required [to move forward with tariffs],” said William  Marshall, trade partner at law firm Tiang & Partners in Hong Kong.

A Congressional Research Service report published in June said that “absent this separate treatment, Hong Kong may be subject to the same tariffs and other trade determinations that apply to China”.

“However, there may be questions about whether all such treatment can be extended immediately if the president revokes Hong Kong’s special status. Some of the uncertainty arises from whether the United States still intends to acknowledge Hong Kong as a member of the [World Trade Organisation] separate from China,” the report read.

Hong Kong is a World Trade Organisation (WTO) member in its own right, and both local and officials in mainland China have said US actions could violate international trading rules.

“If the United States ignores the basic principles of international relations and takes one-sided measures based on its internal law, then the country will violate the rules of the WTO and go against its own interests,” said China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Gao Feng at a press conference in June, sentiment that has been repeated by Hong Kong’s Financial Secretary, Paul Chan Mo-po.

But the Trump administration’s previous disregard for WTO protocols in levying hundreds of billions of dollars worth of unilateral trade tariffs on China – also a member of the international trade body – since July 2018, led analysts to suggest the argument is “a red herring”.

Trump told a press conference at the White House on Tuesday that “Hong Kong will now be treated the same as mainland China, no special privileges, no special economic treatment and no export of sensitive technologies”, before adding that “as you know, we’re placing massive tariffs and have placed very large tariffs on China”.

Should the US decide to not recognise Hong Kong’s status at the WTO, it would require backing from a two-thirds majority of the organisation member states, meaning it could be blocked by China and other members politically aligned with Beijing.

“Since Hong Kong’s trade status has been withdrawn under US law, the US should ‘logically’ align the way it treats Hong Kong with China. All – or some – tariffs that the US imposed on Chinese exports over the past two years will be extended to Hong Kong. That will probably be done gradually to ensure political impact while economic and business consequences are marginal,” said Julien Chaisse, a professor in trade law at City University of Hong Kong.

There is historical precedent for the US suing for suspension of its obligations towards another member of the global trading system. In 1951, both the former Czechoslovakia and the US sued to suspend their mutual obligations under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) – a precursor to the WTO – after a trade dispute, a move which was backed by GATT members.

“If the US decides they now do not recognise Hong Kong’s membership, it would be for Hong Kong to file a claim [at the WTO],” said Bryan Mercurio, a trade professor at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, who added that there would be few “practical implications for customs and Hong Kong industry, with the exception of the exportation of sensitive products from the US”, given the low level of direct trade with the US.

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs vowed in a statement on Wednesday morning to retaliate in kind.

“To protect its legitimate interests, China will take necessary action to impose sanctions against related US institutions and individuals,” read the statement.

China has already announced details of its promised retaliation against the US for its sanctions over human rights abuses in Xinjiang, with US Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom Samuel Brownback, US Senators Marco Rubio and Ted Cruz, US Representative Chris Smith as well as the Congressional-Executive Commission on China all set to be sanctioned.

The announcement came after the US government last week placed sanctions on several Chinese senior officials in charge of the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region.

“I think Beijing has made some kind of preparation when they drafted the national security law to mitigate the possible impact, though I am not sure to what extent they can deal with the latest US moves,” said Liu Weidong, a Sino-US affairs specialist from Chinese Academy of Social Sciences.

Liu added that the trend of US-China decoupling is “certain” and that both sides will end up getting hurt, with political wisdom now more urgent than ever to diffuse the tension.

“This makes me deeply worried. Like many Chinese scholars have said, China is now facing an extremely difficult situation. Let’s wait and see how the Chinese government will respond and react,” he said.

 

World needs seven planets to eat like a G20 nation, food report finds

DW / Elliot Douglas
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/10/opinion/sunday/twitter-protest-politics.html

Among all the globe’s 20 most industrialized nations, only India and Indonesia maintain a diet low enough in carbon emissions to meet the Paris climate target, according to a report published Thursday. Argentina, Brazil, Canada, Germany and the United States were among the countries that grossly exceeded sustainable levels of food-related carbon emissions, largely due to their high consumption of red meat and dairy products.

“This report clearly shows that food consumption in G20 countries is unsustainable and would require up to 7.4 Earths if adopted globally,” said Joao Campari of the World Wildlife Fund.

Rich countries are consuming more red meat and dairy than is laid out in their countries’ nutritional guidelines and much more than experts say is sustainable for the planet.

The Diets for a Better Future report, published by Norway-based non-profit organization EAT, focused on the national dietary guidelines and consumption rates of Group of 20 (G20) countries. The group is made up of 19 of the world’s most powerful and largest countries plus the European Union.

“This report shows the food system has a long way to go in delivering diets that achieve health and wellbeing within planetary boundaries. Yet the good news is that there is a lot of governments, businesses and citizens can do now to make this happen, building on existing action to bring win-wins to all,” said Professor Corinna Hawkes, director of the University of London’s Centre for Food Policy.

Sustainable food production could prevent pandemics

The Paris climate agreement aims to reduce increases in global temperature to 1.5 degrees Celsius. The “food-print” emissions produced by G20 countries, which account for around 64% of the world’s population, currently create 75% of the total global food-related emissions.

The problem of wasted food is particularly important among the world’s wealthiest nations, said the report’s lead author, Brent Loken, who added that rich countries currently waste too much food.

“The current pandemic has shown just how broken our food system is,” he added.

“The food that we eat and how we produce it are also key drivers in the emergence of deadly viruses such as COVID-19. A shift toward healthy and sustainable diets would reduce the risk of future pandemics,” Loken said.

“The pandemic is a manifestation of our broken relationship with nature and how we produce and consume food is at the heart of this,” Campari added.

Red meat and dairy to blame

About 40% of carbon emissions from global food production come from livestock farming and food waste, with the rest generated mainly by rice production, fertilizer use, land conversion and deforestation to accommodate commercial crops.

As such, red meat and dairy products are some of the least sustainable and most over-consumed foods in G20 countries.

The report also identified that many countries even have national dietary guidelines of red meat and dairy that exceed Planetary Health Diet guidelines. Germany, for example, recommends 50 grams of red meat a day; actual average consumption is almost 110 grams. Global guidelines recommend a maximum of 28 grams.

Argentina and the United States are among the least sustainable food consumers in the G20.

Meanwhile, almost all countries fall short on food consumption of nuts and legumes.

“National dietary guidelines are a lever countries can use to drive the urgently needed transformation to healthier, sustainable diets and, ultimately, a more resilient food system,” Loken said.

The guidelines in most G20 countries also determine food production and regulation, making them vital to curbing emissions.