Photos From America’s Longest War

Soon after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the United States military’s attention turned to Afghanistan, where Al Qaeda’s leaders were based. Many knew an invasion was sure to come.

What no one knew was that Operation Enduring Freedom, the invasion to rout Al Qaeda and its hosts, the Taliban, would turn into a war that is now in its 19th year — America’s longest.

It has vexed three American presidencies and outlasted 13 American military commanders. It has also opened a window, for much of the world, onto a country where modernity still clashes with ancient customs and religious edicts.

Here, in chronological order, are images showing the long arc of the war, as seen through the eyes of New York Times photographers.

2001-2002

The War Begins

Operation Enduring Freedom began on Oct. 7, 2001, with an American bombing campaign against Al Qaeda and the Taliban. On the ground, American Special Operations forces teams linked up with Afghan militias opposed to the Taliban, mainly the Northern Alliance, to drive the Taliban from power. The capital, Kabul, fell in mid-November, along with the Taliban stronghold of Kandahar.

In December, Osama bin Laden, Al Qaeda’s leader, escaped to Pakistan through the mountains around Tora Bora. That same month, an interim Afghan government led by Hamid Karzai was installed.

A United Nations Security Council resolution established the International Security Assistance Force, or ISAF, a military coalition led by the United States.

Northern Alliance troops firing on Taliban positions in rugged territory outside the northeastern city of Taloqan, Afghanistan, in October 2001.Credit.    James Hill for The New York Times

Fighters for the Northern Alliance, an anti-Taliban militia, headed to the front lines near the besieged Taliban stronghold of Kunduz, Afghanistan,  in November 2001.Credit…James Hill for The New York Times On their way into Kabul, Afghanistan, in November 2001, Northern Alliance members found a Taliban fighter in a ditch and killed him, despite his pleas.Credit…Tyler Hicks/The New York Times An American B-52 bomber circled above Tora Bora in eastern Afghanistan, December 2001.Credit…Joao Silva for The New York Times American soldiers at Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul, in August 2002.Credit…Tyler Hicks/The New York Times

2003-2007

Drift to Iraq

Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld announced an end to major combat operations in Afghanistan in May 2003. Even with a major reconstruction effort underway there, and about 8,000 American troops in place, President George W. Bush’s administration began shifting combat resources to the war in Iraq.

In 2004, an Afghan assembly drafted a Constitution. Zalmay Khalilzad, then the American ambassador, said it contained “the foundation for democratic institutions.”

[Read a Times historical photo essay on past Afghan wars, The Empire Stopper.]

The Taliban-led insurgency grew stronger in 2006, carrying out more ambushes and suicide bombings. Despite training and equipment supplied by the United States and ISAF, Afghan security forces could not contain the Taliban resurgence, aided by militants across the border in Pakistan. The United States sent more of its soldiers to the war.

By 2007, about 25,000 American troops were in Afghanistan. Women in Kabul waiting to vote in October 2004. The landmark presidential election quickly fell into dispute.Credit…Tyler Hicks/The New York Times The shadow of a U.S. soldier on patrol in Afghanistan’s Paktika Province, near the border with Pakistan, in August 2005.Credit…Scott Eells for The New York Times Afghan police recruits being trained by DynCorp, a contractor for the U.S. government, in Kabul, in November 2005.Credit…Scott Eells for The New York Times American soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division yelled to others to get out of the line of fire after being ambushed by Taliban fighters in southern Afghanistan, in June 2006.Credit…Tyler Hicks/The New York Times Wounded soldiers in the Korengal Valley in eastern Afghanistan, in October 2007.Credit…Lynsey Addario for The New York Times

2008-2010

Recommitment and Surge

In February 2009, the new American president, Barack Obama, declared a recommitment to the war and deployed 17,000 more troops to Afghanistan, adding to the 36,000 already there.

In December, Mr. Obama announced a “surge” meant to build and train an Afghan security force that would be strong enough to assume responsibility for fighting the insurgency. His plan included sending 30,000 more American troops, bringing the total number to nearly 100,000 by mid-2010. American soldiers during a Taliban attack at Combat Outpost Lowell near Kamu, Afghanistan, in October 2008.Credit…Tyler Hicks/The New York Times President George W. Bush with President Hamid Karzai of Afghanistan during a visit to Kabul, in December 2008.Credit…Lynsey Addario for The New York Times Soldiers from the First Infantry Division on a foot patrol in Hutal, in the southern province of Kandahar, Afghanistan, in January 2009.Credit…Danfung Dennis for The New York Times A German soldier burning a flare at a temporary campsite in the desert of Kunduz Province, in October 2009.Credit…Moises Saman for The New York Times  A bullet-pierced window at a Kabul guest house attacked by the Taliban, in November 2009. Five United Nations workers were killed.Credit…Moises Saman for The New York Times

A suicide bomber struck near a hotel in Kabul in December 2009, killing at least eight people and wounding dozens.Credit…Adam Ferguson for The New York Times President Barack Obama with cadets from the United States Military Academy at West Point, in December 2009.Credit…Doug Mills/The New York Times American Marines on patrol in Marja, in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, in February 2010.Credit…Tyler Hicks/The New York Times Village elders meeting in Marja, in March 2010.Credit…Moises Saman for The New York Times Afghan soldiers rushed a wounded police officer to an American helicopter in Kunar Province, Afghanistan, in March 2010.Credit…Moises Saman for The New York Times American soldiers on a transport plane about to land in Mazar-i-Sharif, Afghanistan, in April 2010.Credit…Damon Winter/The New York Times An American soldier looking over the Pech Valley, in Kunar Province, Afghanistan, in April 2010.Credit…Christoph Bangert for The New York Times Sgt. Grayson C. Colby, right, helped members of his medevac helicopter crew gather the remains of a fellow Marine who was killed by an improvised explosive device, in Helmand Province, in May 2010.Credit…Tyler Hicks/The New York Times Members of the First Battalion, 87th Infantry, tended to a wounded comrade in Kunduz, in September 2010.Credit…Damon Winter/The New York Times

2011-2013

A Troop Drawdown

In May 2011, a U.S. Navy SEAL team killed Osama bin Laden in a compound in Abbottabad, Pakistan, where he had been living for years. In June, Mr. Obama announced that he would pull 33,000 troops from Afghanistan by mid-2012.

In 2012, Afghanistan’s president, Hamid Karzai, began blaming United States and coalition troops for rising civilian casualties, as his relationships with American leaders deteriorated.

Afghans took over most security responsibilities in 2013, with the U.S.-led coalition’s forces shifting to training and counterterrorism operations. Soldiers boarded a transport helicopter in Kunduz, in March 2011.Credit…Damon Winter/The New York Times Fighter jets on the aircraft carrier John C. Stennis flew sorties into Afghanistan from the North Arabian Sea, in January 2012.Credit…Tyler Hicks/The New York Times Marines inspecting a load of equipment for shipment back to the United States from Camp Leatherneck in southern Afghanistan, in July 2012.Credit…Mauricio Lima for The New York Times Afghan soldiers, left, and American soldiers blew up a Taliban firing position in the village of Layadira, in Kandahar Province, in February 2013.Credit…Bryan Denton for The New York Times Members of the 101st Airborne Division in Paktia Province, in April 2013.Credit…Sergey Ponomarev for The New York Times Samiullah, 8 months old and malnourished, is held by his mother, Islam Bibi, 15, at a hospital in Lashgar Gar, in Helmand Province, in September 2013.Credit…Daniel Berehulak for The New York Times Sayed Wazir, 40, a former mujahadeen, firing a rocket toward Taliban positions in surrounding hills, in Wardak Province, in November 2013.Credit…Daniel Berehulak for The New York Times The view from a Humvee of Highway 1, which links Kabul with major cities, in November 2013.Credit…Daniel Berehulak for The New York Times

2014-2018

A Taliban Resurgence

On Dec. 31, 2014, the combat mission in Afghanistan formally ended, but the American military presence in the country did not. Mr. Obama announced a timetable for the withdrawal of most troops by the end of 2016.

After a 2014 election marred by fraud, Ashraf Ghani became president, but he signed a power-sharing agreement with his top opponent, Abdullah Abdullah.

On the battlefield, the Afghan security forces increasingly struggled against the Taliban taking heavy casualties and losing territory.

In August 2017, President Trump said that while his first instinct had been to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan, he would continue to prosecute the war. He stressed that withdrawal decisions would be based on combat conditions, not on predetermined timelines.

The United Nations said 2018 was the deadliest year for Afghan civilians since it had begun tracking civilian casualties 10 years earlier. The aftermath of an American airstrike on the Doctors Without Borders hospital in Kunduz, in October 2015. Forty-two people were killed in the attack, which was later found to be the result of a cascade of human errors and mechanical and equipment failures. Credit…Victor J. Blue for The New York TimesA view of the outskirts of Lashkar Gah in Helmand Province, in March 2016.Credit…Adam Ferguson for The New York Times

The Kart-e-Sakhi cemetery in Kabul, in April 2016. More than 28,000 Afghan police officers and soldiers have been killed in the war since 2015, President Ashraf Ghani said last year.Credit…Adam Ferguson for The New York Times Section 60 of Arlington National Cemetery in Virginia, where many veterans of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are buried, in May 2018.Credit…Damon Winter/The New York Times The outskirts of Khost, a city in eastern Afghanistan, in July 2018.Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

2018-2020

Peace Talks and a Historic Deal

Late in 2018, American and Taliban negotiators began holding peace talks. The discussions continued well into 2020, in Doha, Qatar. (The Afghan government was excluded from the talks — the Taliban refused to meet with its officials.)

On Feb. 29, the United States signed a peace deal with the Taliban, opening the door to a gradual, final troop withdrawal from Afghanistan, and the beginning of direct talks between the Afghan government and the insurgency to determine the country’s future.

As of February, about 12,000 American troops were still in the country.

The United States has spent more than $2 trillion on the war effort. More than 2,400 American troops and nearly 700 troops from other nations in the coalition have died. More than 38,000 civilians have been killed, and among the Afghan security forces, about 60,000 are estimated to have died since the start of the war. A funeral for one of the 63 people killed at a wedding in Kabul by an Islamic State suicide bomber, in August 2019.Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

The crater left by a car bomb attack, for which the Taliban claimed responsibility, in Kabul, in September 2019.Credit…Jim Huylebroek for The New York Times

President Trump at Bagram Air Base in Kabul, in November 2019. Credit…Erin Schaff/The New York Times

After their base was overrun by the Taliban, Afghan police officers inspecting a replacement trench, in February 2020.Credit…Kiana Hayeri for The New York Times

Produced by Craig Allen, David Furst, Mikko Takkunen and Gaia Tripoli.

Source link:https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/29/world/asia/afghanistan-war-photos-pictures.html

不服来辩#21 年轻人要不要走出舒适圈

不知从何时开始,走出舒适圈一词变得流行起来。励志网友开始奋发图强,誓要走出舒适圈,做更精彩的自己;各个大V也开始关注个人成长问题,积极宣传:我们应该不断去挑战自己,警醒自己,逼迫自己去进步,告诉大家:你的舒适圈,正在慢慢毁掉你自己

每个人都处在一个无形的圈子里,所谓舒适圈,就是那个让你感到熟悉的环境,有你认识的人,做自己力所能及或是驾轻就熟的事,让我们可以轻松、自在地活着。

但是年轻人到底需不需要走出舒适圈的话题,一直存在着不小争议。

最近一轮关于舒适圈的争论,源于年初蔡澜先生在受到网友提问如何走出舒适圈时,回答:为何?

为何要走出舒适圈?年轻人该不该走出舒适圈?

觉得要走出的朋友们认为:一直停留在舒适圈的人就像正在被温水煮的小青蛙,虽不自知,但身上向上的冲劲、拼搏的毅力、冒风险的勇气,都在被一点点钝化,而这些正是年轻人在个人发展中十分重要的品质。如果一直停留在眼前的舒适圈,就会失去探索更大、更好的圈子的机会。走出舒适圈,就是不沉溺于眼前的安逸,是成长、成功的关键。

觉得不用走出的朋友们则表示:从小就面临升学压力,大学后面临工作压力,工作后面临家庭压力。家庭压力还包括着买房、买车、生孩子……总是被教育要走出舒适圈,现实生活却连舒适也称不上。不懈的努力不就是为了让自己过得更加舒适一点吗?在自己的舒适圈内把擅长的事情做到最好不也是一种成功吗?

那么你认为年轻人该不该走出舒适圈呢?

来评论区说说你的想法💡  参与方式:

觉得应该走出去的,请在评论区用“emoji👍+你的观点

觉得不用走出去的,请在评论区用“emoji👎+你的观点

举个🌰

👍沉迷在一个舒适的环境里太久,人就会封闭、狭隘、缺乏丰富视角。走出舒适圈,不断的习惯并推翻当前的步骤,不断的尝试新事物,体验新经历,让自己的视角变丰富,选择就会更多。即使走不出,也是一次有趣的挑战、一段宝贵的经历。

👎舒适的生活就是一直前进,再新鲜的领域可能都会变成你的舒适圈,我们不一定要走出去,一直往前就好了。即使没有往前,在自己的舒适圈内提高也是一种突破。不要被贩卖焦虑的毒鸡汤拖着走,成功没那么厉害,我只希望你开心一点。

不服来辩#20 要不要继续延期复工?

 

截止今日,新型冠状病毒肺炎疫情全国累计确诊78196例,累计治愈29846例。今日稍早一些,国家卫健委统计数据,湖北以外地区新增死亡病例为零!这是自2月4日以来,湖北以外地区首次新增死亡病例为零。2月13日以来,全国新增确诊人数和死亡人数都开始明显下降。虽然还不能说已经战胜疫情,但最黑暗的时刻应该已经过去。

疫情取得阶段性胜利的同时,复工率也在逐步提升,其中广东、江苏、北京、上海、四川、等外贸大省复工迅速,浙江省千万美元以上企业复工率更达到90%。相比之下很多内地省份还在严防把控,严格排查人员流动,你觉得现在复工是时候吗?

一方面中小微企业急需劳动力开启生产,抗风险能力薄弱,再不开工可能会导致公司倒闭,严重了甚至会影响税收;另一方面疫情正是集中精力对抗的关键时刻,需要把握后最后一道关卡。

避免疫情在更大范围内扩散,需要对人员的大规模流动有所控制,与此同时,国家经济急需注入新的活力,又需要人员尽快复工。如何在二者之间取得平衡,这已经是一个亟需给出答案的两难选择

你怎么看待呢?

来评论区说说你的想法💡

参与方式:

觉得应该继续延期复工的,请在评论区用“emoji👍+你的观点”

觉得不应该继续延期复工的,请在评论区用“emoji👎+你的观点”

举个🌰:

“👍疫情还没有得到完全控制,这个时候复工实在得不偿失,伴随着复工的大规模人员流动,疫情只怕会二次传播,应该等到疫情控制住再开始复工。”

“👎从疫情防控的角度来看,目前大规模复工肯定会有潜在风险,只有等到疫情完全得到控制才是最安全稳妥的办法。但无论是对中国经济,还是每个微小的个体,都无法承受如此长时间的等待,是时候复工了。”

不服来辩#19 死后社交账号要不要销号?

互联网飞速发展的今天,日常社交也越来越多地依靠社交网络,大家也习惯在微信、qq、豆瓣上描述自己。

这些平台和账号保存着大量关于日常、心情、事件的描写,仿佛是在这些虚拟世界中,也存活着一个充满情感的,人格化的“虚拟自我

那么一百年后,现实生活中的我们离开了,保有“虚拟自我的社交帐号又该何去何从呢?

牛津大学曾有一项研究表明,社交巨头Facebook至今已成立16年,其死亡用户已经超过了3000万,这3000万用户的踪迹形成了一个巨大的数据墓地。有专家分析,以此速度,半个世纪后Facebook的死亡用户或许会比活人用户还多。

然而,大部分人从未思考过或者不清楚数字遗产或死后的社交帐号该如何处理。

据日本NHK电视台《close-up 现代+》栏目做过的一项调查,55%的日本网友对如何处理数字遗产感到不安。同时,95.2%的网友不知道拿数字遗产该怎么办。

各大社交平台的态度也不完全相同2015 2 月,Facebook 推出了「代理人」功能。一旦死亡被证明,Facebook旗下各大账号会应资产执行人设置中的要求:要么删除账号;要么移交给代理人继续保留,以供亲友纪念死者,允许代理人更改用户个人资料图片,置顶帖子功能以及要求平台注销该账户等等。QQ号超过一定时间就会被自动回收,最后被删除。谷歌则设置有用户死后账号数据是删除还是保留的选项,将选择的权利留给用户本人。

虽然通过社交帐号使人重塑复生的事情并不现实,但是与之相关的死后社交账号要不要销号的问题也越来越受关注。

那么你觉得社交账户在我们离去后要不要销号呢?

在评论区说说你的想法吧💡

参与方式:

觉得应该销号的,请在评论区用“emoji👍+你的观点

觉得不应该销号的,请在评论区用“emoji👎+你的观点

举个🌰

👍支持销号。社交账号保存了太多我的隐私,即使是亲近的人,也有不想让他们看到的信息和内容,可能是一次善意的谎言,可能是一次情绪的波动,可能是一场生活的巨变,这些本就只来自、属于的内容,还是和我一起离开吧。活着的人继续过自己的日子,也能在一定程度上避免心理学上的感觉剥削(某些形式的数字哀悼,比如由一名家庭成员保持逝者社交账户的活跃,可能会导致其他人的心理创伤,使他们无法从亲人/朋友离世的悲伤情绪中走出来,继续前行)。

👎不支持销号,人间走一趟哪能不留下点足迹👣。社交账号上的动态日常留着给自己后代看看自己多好,还能让他们知道我这个长辈是个什么样子的人,去那些地方玩过,吃过什么好东西,这也是一笔财富。

不服来辩#18 一线医务人员子女参加中考加10分值得推广吗?

 

昨日,湖北官方发布《关于进一步关爱和激励新冠肺炎疫情防控一线医务人员的若干措施》,若干措施提出,加强对一线医务人员的政策倾斜,2020 年参加中考的一线医务人员子女,有关市州可在其录取总分基础上增加 10 分后参加中考招生录取。

政策一出台,便引起了网友们的激烈讨论。有朋友觉得医生奋战在疫情第一线,于情于理都应该给予奖励,无私奉献者值得这样的回报。

还有朋友觉得此做法对医护人员有失公平,对于一线医护人员来说,这个政策只适用于有子女且适龄中考的医护人员,那么其他无子女或子女不是中考年纪的医院人员呢?激励是肯定要给的,不过这个政策实在有失公允。

你怎么看呢?

来评论区说说你的想法💡~

参与方式:

觉得值得推广的,请在评论区用“emoji👍+你的观点”

觉得不值得推广的,请在评论区用“emoji👎+你的观点”

举个🌰:

“👍10分的差距会淘汰很大一部分人,一些原本可能进好一些高中的就能进去,以及因为加分进了更好一些高中的医护人员子女。谁能保证里面会没有将来要报考医科大学的人呢?这次的疫情本来就是医疗系统出了大问题才会造成这样,我觉得值得推广。”

“👎奖励一线医护人员变成奖励他们的子女,并以牺牲社会考生的利益为代价,照顾一线医护人员。医护人员奉献大,并不等于其子女需要照顾。要提拔奖励也是奖励医护人员自身。”

不服来辩#17 恋爱是否需要作为一门课程学习?

在情人节的后一天,让我们来讨论一下恋爱这件事。

国内许多大学都开设有一门独特的选修课,在小编的大学生涯中,这堂选修课一直是最热门的课堂之一,学生们总是对它抱有极高的热情和期待,这就是恋爱课堂

这样的课程一经推广,恋爱是否应作为一种课程来学习的话题便引起不少的讨论和争议。

支持的朋友们认为:这样的课堂可以帮助大家树立正确的恋爱观,比如帮助你认清恋爱的本质,如何更好地处理亲密关系中的矛盾与冲突,告诉所有人在感情中需要负责、需要尊重、需要自爱。能够在一定程度上弥补部分朋的先天不足(不能早恋/家庭本身在亲密关系的处理中有问题),和后天畸形(没有经验/社会舆论或个人经历导致恋爱观念有问题

不支持的朋友们则认为:将恋爱作为一门课程,那将会由谁用什么方式来教授呢?每个人都有自己的恋爱观,每个人对于恋爱的需求也不同,很难说哪种就一定是错的。并且恋爱本身也是没有办法学习的,课程的方式只会让这样美好的事情因为课程程序化,而不是跟随自己的内心去享受爱本身。

那么你是否支持将恋爱作为一门课程学习呢?

欢迎大家在评论区说说自己的想法💡。参与方式:

支持或认同的,请在评论区用“emoji👍+你的观点

不支持或不认同的,请在评论区用“emoji👎+你的观点

举个🌰

👍将恋爱作为一门课程学习,并不是只学习一些技巧方式,更重要的是树立一个正确的恋爱观念,教会我们如何处理亲密关系,如何在感情中善待他人也善待自己。如果这样的课程能够推广,那会不会少一些丧失了爱的能力的人,少一些认为爱就是控制/占有/勒索的人,少一些在亲密关系中无意识地伤害或受伤的人?

👎恋爱本来是充满未知的,需要我们去探索去体验,在过程中找到适合自己的恋爱方式、适合自己的人,这就是恋爱的美好所在。而课堂的形式会将其僵化,原本的美好与幻想也会被固有的理论打破。更何况每个人都有自己的经历和需求,没有谁能说自己的恋爱观念和方式是绝对正确并且适合所有人的。

To My Darling的小情书

各位可爱的红板报老友,见信启:

2020给了我们一个冰冷的开始,我们接受着亲情、人性与爱的考验。疫情无情人有情,面对未来我们一无所知,面对现在我选择坚定着去爱。

即将到来的这个不能出去下馆子,不能把酒共良宵,不能牵手领证的情人节,你的打开方式是什么?

也许你:

尚未回到有他的城市,不能与他拉手,不能与他一起吃饭,不能与他一起…“凄凉别后两应同,最是不胜清怨月明中。大爱无疆,小爱绵绵。真正的爱是人远心不远,疫情当前,亲爱的,不能拉着你的手陪你逛街看电影,请你吃饭选礼物,但情人节,我在!

也许你:

情人节秒变催婚节,还没复工的你是否坐在爸妈身边,没人约。。。只有左右手的紧紧相拥。写给未来的ta一份小情书吧,带着新年的祈愿。表白吧。那感觉应该就是,我们置身在极高的两座山脊上,遥遥的彼此不能相望,却能听见你温柔的声音传来。

也许你:

你们是老夫老妻。假期变得悠长,是否想起你们的婚礼誓言?婚礼千辛万苦憋出来的vow瞬间实现:一屋两人、三餐四季,万水千山、百年一心。是否经得住了突然猫冬的考验?我就想问一句,最近三餐谁做的?不能出门的情人节写给最近辛苦的ta一段话吧,ta暖你的胃,你暖ta的心。如果可以,两个人一起下厨吧,做顿爱的晚餐!

也许也许

2020年的开端,殊不容易。但正所谓一起走过患难,才会更加坚定。在重重困难面前,两颗因为爱而坚定相信的心更加珍贵。

在此红板报小馆纵队2020年情人节特别企划To My Darling的小情书,在评论留言区写一段话给你的ta,启动云爱你,发射出你的小心心吧!

参与方式说明:

在本文评论区留言,云爱你的表达暗号为:To My Darling+要表白的人名+想说的话+留言人的名字

举个🌰

To My Darling 小翠儿,只愿君心似我心,定不负相思意。等疫情过去,我来娶你!强子

大家可以选择自由发挥哦~

截至217日早10点,我们会公布获赞前三名的表白者,届时有工作人员联系您并送出一份红板报专属周边礼物🎁~

我们真诚地希望,这篇满载爱❤️推送可以在带给大家甜蜜的同时,也带给大家力量。

Love keeps us kind.

期待大家的小情书

不服来辩#16 碎片化阅读是利是弊

 

Locket app收集了1000000个用户一天中打开手机的频率,数据显示,普通人平均一天要打开手机100次,平均每天使用9小时以上。随着科技的发展,传统的阅读方式也由报纸、书籍变成手机、电脑。

我们正处在一个信息爆炸的时代,公众号、知乎、各大论坛等提供了海量的内容供阅读,只要想汲取,非常方便,这种碎片化阅读在一定程度上填补了多数人大量的空余时间,打发空闲。同时也在一定程度上,补充专业知识和开拓眼界。

那碎片化阅读是利是弊呢?

研究显示碎片化阅读停留于浅层阅读,会使人失去思考能力,无法使文章信息转化为自己的知识储备。同时会提高阅读的阈值,大脑会懒惰到不想思考就会自动选择阅读那些标题有吸引力的文章,很难静下心来仔细阅读同时无法形成系统性的知识。

但知识浩如烟海,在没有足够的时间也没有足够的精力系统性的学习的情况下,碎片化阅读无疑降低了获取知识的门槛,且阅读成本低,能帮助读者用尽可能短的时间去涉猎不同的知识,认识世界的广阔。

你怎么认为呢?

来评论区说说你的想法💡。参与方式:

觉得碎片化阅读利大于弊的,请在评论区用“emoji👍+你的观点”

觉得碎片化阅读弊大于利的,请在评论区用“emoji👎+你的观点”

举个🌰:

“👍通勤、如厕的时间用来碎片化阅读再合适不过,阅读门槛低,用来消磨时间再合适不过,有些人原本就不爱读书,对于他们,比较轻松的碎片化阅读无疑就是一个额外的学习机会。那些原本就爱看书,肯下苦功夫钻研学术的人,碎片化阅读只是拓宽了他们获取信息的渠道。”

“👎碎片化阅读的弊端太明显了:知识零碎不成体系,阅读太浅,读者容易以偏概全。只是接触了表层就以为掌握了某个领域,只是看了一些简短的结论就以为懂得了真理,长久以往就容易养成惰性思维,被“充实感”给蒙蔽了。短期可以,长期以来的碎片化阅读有弊无利”

下一个宝藏推荐人就是你!

「宝藏推荐人」活动已经满月啦!感谢大家一直以来的关注与支持~

从2月11日起,活动评选将对全体推荐人开放,我们将从3个方面,一周想法的发布数、鼓掌数以及评论数总量(各占比重50%、20%、30%),综合评选出当周的“宝藏推荐人”。

获选的推荐人将会获得5大特权与奖励:

1 精美礼品

红板报官方定制,超高颜值小周边,抱枕、帆布包、贺卡等任你选。

2 免审特权

发布的想法无需审核,直接发布!

3 哪都有你

推荐位、广告位全站曝光,更有机会登上开屏页。

4 欢乐面基

红板报官方线下福利活动,将优先邀请你参与。

5 共同成长

媒体合作。如果你有相关媒体资源,可以和我们一起干票大的!

—————-

欢迎多多参与多多分享!

如果你还没有成为推荐人,可以加官方小助手微信:chunji3022,申请成为推荐人!

不服来辩#15 疫情结束后在线办公将何去何从?

春节后的第一个工作周,为了响应在家隔离的号召,全国各地大小公司共同开始了一场远程办公的大型实验。

我们一不小心就实现了不换衣服不出门就上班的梦想。但是亲身体验过居家办公后,才发现并没有想象中那么轻松与惬意。并且由于环境和设备等因素,大多数人表示并没有在办公室中效率高。随之,远程办公、在家办公是否能大范围推行,甚至成为常态这一话题,引起了一波讨论。

支持的朋友们认为:在家办公能够省去通勤需要的时间、金钱、精力,还能营造更舒适的办公环境,不必一直端着架子,不必限于公司的时间安排,甚至不必压抑情绪,自由又舒适,何乐而不为呢?

不支持的朋友则认为:在家工作并没有工作所需的氛围和环境,即使是个自律的人,要想高效工作,依然要面临外界的重重考验。并且对很多特定职业来说,远程办公带来的沟通障碍会给团队分工、协作带来很多困扰。并且没有了上、下班的仪式感,无论是什么时候出现的工作需求,似乎在领导眼中都变成了开个电脑就能搞定的事情。在国内职场本来就私人界限模糊的情况下,在家办公反倒为变相加班大开方便之门。

你适应在家办公的节奏了吗?感受又如何呢?

因为疫情而迅速发展的远程办公,在这一切风平浪静之后又会何去何从呢?

欢迎大家在评论区各抒己见。参与方式:

觉得在线办公值得提倡的,请在评论区用“emoji👍+你的观点

觉得在家办公不值得提倡的,请在评论区用“emoji👎+你的观点

举个🌰

👍在家办公能省去我每天近三个小时的通勤时间,不用挤地铁、赶公交,不用和不想见的人客套寒暄,只需要专注在工作内容上。可以自由安排时间,在舒适放松的环境中,感受到工作本身带来的成就感。

👎因为远程办公的工作特征难以权衡,包括奖惩措施、工作环境等会给管理带来很多不便,也会给日常工作带来很多麻烦。比如,为了证明我在工作,摄像头已经开了一整天了,原本的周报、月报都改成了日报,一天中一半的工作时间都用来编造和汇报。两天下来,感觉比在办公室一个星期还疲惫,还是怀念办公室的日子。